Back to systems
charityfrog
Book a call →
Demo mode — fictional data for Example Charity

Expert Clone demo — CharityFrog

Your clones
3
Experts cloned
187
Consultations this month
94%
Rated 'as good as Alex'
41 hrs
Expert time saved
this month, across the team
A
Alex Gibson · Cloned
Founder · 22 years of fundraising · Cloned from 47 sessions
🟢 Consent given · reviewed quarterlyAbout this clone
I've got a first meeting with a potential major donor next Thursday. £50k+ potential. She's a retired lawyer, no prior contact with us, referred by a mutual friend. What would you do in the first meeting?
S
A

Great referral — those usually convert if you don't rush them. Two things matter more than everything else in a first meeting like this.

First, don't pitch. Do not walk in with a case for support, a leaflet, or an ask. Walk in with two questions and shut up. The two questions are:

  • "What made you want to meet?" — she has a reason. It's rarely what you assume. Let her tell you.
  • "What has your relationship with charity looked like over the last few years?" — this tells you if she's a considered donor or an event-and-appeal donor. Different playbook for each.

The first meeting is a listening meeting. Nothing else.

📎 Same approach used with Diana Ashworth, Feb 2024 — resulted in £22k gift 3 months later

Second, come with one specific story, not a summary of the charity. Don't do the mission-vision-impact triangle. Tell her about one person the charity has helped and why it mattered. I'd use James's story right now — the skydive, the diagnosis, the moment. Concrete, specific, no charity jargon. If she asks for more, offer more. If she doesn't, don't force it.

📎 Same principle used at CIOF training session, 2023

The instinct on a £50k+ prospect is to over-prepare. Don't. Prepare like it's a coffee. Send a warm follow-up within 24 hours referencing one specific thing she said — that's what makes people remember you.

Want me to draft the follow-up email template for you now, so it's ready to send Friday morning?

What if she asks about specific programmes? I'm nervous I won't know the numbers cold.
S
A

Two rules for numbers in a first meeting.

Rule 1: Never guess. If you don't know a figure, say "Let me get you the exact number after the meeting — I'd rather send you the right one than the roughly-right one." That is not weakness. Wealthy donors respect precision. They've spent their lives being lied to slightly by people who wanted their money. Being the one person who says "I'll check" builds trust immediately.

📎 Almost verbatim the phrase used with Sir Charles Whitmore, Jul 2023 — led to £15k first gift

Rule 2: Know three numbers cold. For Challenging MND right now those would be:

  • £284k granted directly to families this year
  • 187 families supported
  • 83% of income goes to charitable activity (that last one matters — it's the one wealthy donors quietly look up on the Charity Commission site)

Any other number, say you'll check. And then actually check. Send it within 24 hours. That single behaviour is how you build a reputation for reliability inside a small circle of major donors. Two of them talk, and suddenly you have three warm introductions.

📎 Same pattern used with The Beaumont Family Trust referral chain, 2022

One more thing — if she asks a hard question you don't want to answer (about cost ratios, exec salary, reserves), don't dodge. Answer it directly and briefly. Then move on. Donors who ask hard questions have decided to trust you enough to test you. Passing the test is worth more than avoiding the question.

What would you have done differently if this referral had come from a colder connection — like a LinkedIn intro rather than a mutual friend?
S
A

Very different playbook. A LinkedIn intro is a 15-minute coffee, not a meeting. Frame it that way from the invite: "20 minutes, no agenda, just to say hello." You are earning the second meeting, not converting the first. Take zero materials.

📎 Same approach used with 4 out of 5 cold LinkedIn intros in 2024 — 3 progressed to warm relationships

The mutual-friend intro is different because you've already been vouched for. She's expecting you to be someone worth her time — so treat it accordingly. Better preparation, more specific stories, and don't be afraid to hint at what a partnership could look like if she asks. Don't volunteer it. Wait for her to ask.

📎 Consistently the top-converting first-meeting pattern in the last 3 years

If you get a second meeting from either, that's where the real work starts. Want me to walk through what a second meeting should look like?

How would Alex approach…·What would Alex say to a trustee who…·What's Alex's rule for…
Ask Alex's clone anything about fundraising...
Alex Gibson has consented to this clone. Reviewed quarterly. Feedback is logged and reshapes the model.

How your team is using clones this month

See full analytics →
A
Alex Gibson
112

Most consulted on: "How would Alex handle a first meeting with…"

Attributed to £47k of live pipeline
E
Emma Robertson
48

Most consulted on: "How does Emma decide on beneficiary appeals?"

Saved ~16 hrs of Emma's time this month
R
Rachel M.
27

Most consulted on: "How does Rachel open a legacy conversation?"

4 legacy conversations progressed since clone launched
🤖 AI is working on right now
  • Preparing this week's clone review — 187 sessions summarised for Alex, Emma and Rachel to review
  • Detecting patterns where Alex's clone is asked questions outside his stated specialism — 3 flagged for scope conversation
  • Suggesting a new clone: Jane Whitmore (Chair) for governance & trustee-specific queries — team requested it 6 times this month
  • Updating Rachel's playbook based on the 4 legacy conversations progressed this quarter
Recent activity
View full log →
  • 💬 Sarah consulted Alex's clone re: Thursday's major donor meeting
    2 hours ago
  • 🛡️ Alex reviewed 32 consultations from last week — no corrections requested
    yesterday
  • 📈 £15k gift closed by Rachel — credited a clone consultation as key prep
    2 days ago
  • 🎓 New knowledge added: Alex's July session on legacy conversations (recorded)
    4 days ago
  • 🔒 Team member Lucy given access to Emma's clone for beneficiary questions
    5 days ago
  • 💬 Emma's clone consulted 12 times by trustee sub-committee ahead of Q3 board meeting
    1 week ago
  • 🛡️ Quarterly review completed with Alex — clone updated, 4 corrections applied
    1 week ago